<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Dustin at Github - Latest Comments in Memcached 1.4.0</title><link>http://dustinatgithub.disqus.com/</link><description>My github page.</description><atom:link href="https://dustinatgithub.disqus.com/memcached_140/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:04:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Memcached 1.4.0</title><link>http://dustin.github.com/2009/07/16/memcached-1.4.html#comment-29845400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With regards to the amazon machine instance it would be great if you could outline exactly the steps taken to update to the base amazon image so that the paranoid among us can recreate it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ian2468</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:04:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Memcached 1.4.0</title><link>http://dustin.github.com/2009/07/16/memcached-1.4.html#comment-15121036</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi dustin,&lt;br&gt;I use binary protocol with memcache version 1.4 still not setup a client ...default connection factory works fine &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ashishsx</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:50:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Memcached 1.4.0</title><link>http://dustin.github.com/2009/07/16/memcached-1.4.html#comment-12931631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Glad you like it.  Several of us worked on this and we're all relieved to finally get this behind us.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dustin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:14:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Memcached 1.4.0</title><link>http://dustin.github.com/2009/07/16/memcached-1.4.html#comment-12927670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congratulations Dustin! I started using Memcached about 3 months ago and I'm just absolutely amazed at how well it performs, and how easy it was to integrate into an application. That's not to say there isn't some work with any caching solution, but there are very few instances where I've used a piece of software and then thought to myself, "Hey, that worked pretty darn well (sigh of relief)."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Reindel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:33:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Memcached 1.4.0</title><link>http://dustin.github.com/2009/07/16/memcached-1.4.html#comment-12900284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;See this thread:  &lt;a href="http://groups.google.com/group/memcached/browse_thread/thread/8c7eea241def70f9" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://groups.google.com/group/memcached/browse_thread/thread/8c7eea241def70f9"&gt;http://groups.google.com/gr...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We're actively trying to get people to help out with Windows support.  There some to be few Windows users out there who are willing to participate.  :/&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dustin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 01:02:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Memcached 1.4.0</title><link>http://dustin.github.com/2009/07/16/memcached-1.4.html#comment-12899963</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's great - pity I'm stuck on 1.2 due to a lack of Windows builds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, some people do use Windows and do find it providing better performance than Linux.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Darkimmortal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:35:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>